Well, I think this will tend to get recursive, real fast. The murderer gets killed by the family member? Well, that's a new murder trial without any doubt who's the killer. Then this'll go back and forth, until the family with the fewer or less combative family members loses. Congratulations, you've just reinvented blood feuding.
But how is the law ever certain of that? Every year there are innocent people being released from prison for things they didn't do.
9 people were released from death row last year and exonerated.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_exo鈥?/a>
The law was so certain they did it, that the law was ready to put them to death. Imagine how many people the law missed, who were innocent and who were never discovered.What do you say to a law of locking a murderer inside a room with a family member of the victim for 5 min?
I say, "In a parallel universe, that murder never happened. And the family member murdered in this universe is alive and well in another universe."
I would agree only if after 4.5 minutes, a family member pulls a .357 and ends the "discussion".What do you say to a law of locking a murderer inside a room with a family member of the victim for 5 min?
I think that's a good way to get a second member of the family killed. Not everyone has murder in their heart.
I agree with everything you just wrote above.
No comments:
Post a Comment